News

This story is great. Shows what a group of kind, caring people can do for others.

Warms the heart. I will always believe in the goodness that lives in all of us. God's speed for his wife's swift and complete recovery! Thank you for sharing this uplifting story of humanity at its finest!!🙌🏻

Lesley Xu

not a fan of taxes but I sure like what they buy.

From an NB resident who needs to drive a truck to do my job effectively. I believe we already pay the highest tax at the pump/litre. I’m all for helping the environment but folks out here are really struggling to keep up with expenses. Wages are not going up at the same rate as new taxes or GDP for that matter. If this program was developed to help folks with low and middle incomes afford this new tax then I’d be all for it. I’m just tired of being used as the government’s and big business’s bank account. Seems like when there’s a problem that needs fixing we pay for it disproportionately.

A Liberal policy fiasco.

Only the government would believe creating a tax could save the environment

Vote of non confidence!!!!

Vote of non confidence!!!!

It is your typical, lying, smoke and mirrors, math. Done by a bunch of completly incompetent, self serving, egotistical, narcissists. The problem is that our current education system is failing students, because of left leaning educators won't teach proper history, and social studies.

Carbon tax is another tax.

Taxation is theft.

The Trudeau version of carbon pricing flies in the face of the economic arguments in favour of carbon pricing. His scheme has become nothing more than wealth redistribution and vote-buying dressed up as an environmental issue. business.financialpost.com/opinion/jack-mintz-the-liberals-ignored-my-carbon-tax-plan-theirs-is-m...

And zero credibility for anyone who describes atmospheric Carbon Dioxide as "pollution". It's no more a pollutant than is water or Oxygen.

We can’t tax ourselves out of debt. Only a Liberal would believe this is possible. Budgets balance themselves right?

I would love to hear a solution instead of complaints. If people don't approve of carbon pricing, then what strategies do we put forward to reduce emissions and put a stop to climate change? We have 12 years. And so far all I hear is excuses to put off doing anything. My children deserve to breathe clean air.

Trudeau is a joke, if Trudeau truly cared about the environment we would have a pipeline to each coast.. Not to mention his personal Carbon foot print is massive.. Our next PM will have to buy/lease new air craft as Trudeau will cycle these out of service.

There is so much more going on in Canada that is devastating our country it is hard to know where to begin. We are no longer Strong and Free we are Broke and Weak. Thank you Liberals.

TRUE True True and TRUE.

We need a pipeline to the coast. NEB and Liberal policy is stifling any economic growth in Alberta while we sell barrels of oil at a fraction of the value if we were to sell it elsewhere. Resurrect Energy East. Create jobs and stop the Liberals.

One last thing. What are your thoughts on JT trying to buy a temporary seat in the UN Security Council? How does that benefit Canada? The province's?

...( pen name: Purley Quirt) > Considering the longtime wealth generation of Energy sources ( especially oil and the construct of it's ownership) you could see why a group of countries would want to " tap into" any ways or means they could to " try and do the same". > When they zeroed in on the Paris Agreement ..the concurrent development of the " investment arm" ( ? the AIIB) ..the focus of what investments are best ...the publication of intent to invest (excerpt) see url the Paris Agreement’s goals will unlock capital investment at a rate no other policy initiative can match. > Here’s why: > Right now, an unprecedented amount of actual wealth is “sitting on the sidelines,” awaiting the next wave economy—the transformational moment of world-building investment potential. More than $8 trillion tied up in negative yield bonds, along with another $5 trillion in corporate cash holdings, are waiting for a go sign. All that capital is looking for reliable growth and secure returns. =(1) Climate-resilient investments, = (2) high-efficiency new energy technologies, = (3) services that build value in local communities, = hold far more growth potential than any old-style industrial production standards. The International Monetary Fund estimates that $5.1 trillion per year in direct and indirect assistance to high-carbon energy is not only a waste of public resources, but qualifies as “destructive spending” that undermines value across whole economies. The opportunity to move that money into the building of a new economy of sustainable prosperity open to all ..... is what the Paris Agreement is designed to activate. source: www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2017/may/30/endorsing-the-paris-agr... > KEY It is (3) = services that build value in local communities, that needs .....to experience profitability at the bottom line ( Community Co-ownership with Philanthropy) NOT .... at the top line ( multiple countries laying claim )

Hi Mike, we haven't been in touch since Amarjeet took over this part of Millwoods. Understandably I, and a number of others are not too happy with your mob. Vote buying with this Carbon Tax rebate business, Then there is bill C-71; another vote getting attempt by JT at the expense of legal firearms owners (fellow Canadians for goodness sake). He, you and the other Liberals, the RCMP and other police are unable to deal with gangs and organized crime so up goes the smoke screen of C-71. I'm sorry Mike but Canadians just aren't that stupid. And to top it all off there's JT's inability to get any pipelines built. Do you lot have any idea what that is costing the country? I'm just getting a little tired of the lies and BS.

And who does Blair think he's kidding with this Consultation? 😁

Totally agree. Zoolander and his pack of economically illiterate buffoons have to go.

I watched a speech given by the Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, and he said that carbon is something we must work with, but is necessary for the entire planet. The killer we must be aware of is pollution. That is what is needed to be addressed now. We have a window of possibly twelve years in which to turn it around. And how we went from 1.5 billion to 7.5 billion in such a short time also needs discussion and action.

Taking money from one pocket and giving it back with extra is bribing for votes and using tax payers money to do it. This will do nothing for the climate.

We need to start by not calling it carbon. Carbon is that black sooty stuff that is solid and gunks motors up. Switch the conversation by calling it carbon dioxide and people will start to see that the government is literally taxing the air.